Paymento vs NoHoldPay
Paymento earns something few gateways can claim and this page says it up front: they are genuinely non-custodial, and so are we. Their terms state they do not hold, manage, or control your crypto, and the mechanics back it up. On Bitcoin-family chains they derive per-payment addresses from your xpub, the same arrangement NoHoldPay uses. Custody, the axis that decides most of our comparisons, is a tie here, and pretending otherwise would insult your intelligence and our own credibility.
The comparison lives one layer down. On Ethereum, TRON, and Solana, Paymento points every customer at one static wallet address per store. NoHoldPay derives a fresh forwarder for every payment, with your treasury locked in at derivation. Same custody guarantee, an identical fee headline, and very different consequences for privacy, concurrent orders, and what happens the day you want a new wallet.
| NoHoldPay | Paymento | |
|---|---|---|
| Where customer funds land | Your own wallet, or a forwarder locked to it, on every chain | Your own wallet, xpub-derived on UTXO chains, static on the rest |
| Receiving address on ETH, TRON, Solana | A fresh forwarder per payment, treasury fixed at derivation | One static address per store, its receiving history readable by every payer |
| Concurrent invoices for the same amount | Run side by side, each payment has its own address | Told apart by amount matching on the shared address |
| Rotating your receiving wallet | Register a new treasury, future payments follow it | A new wallet on account chains means setting up a new store |
| Fee | 0.5% flat, every route, no fixed fee | 0.5% flat, no fixed fee. The advertised 0.4% needs a PMO token unlaunched as of Aug 2026 |
| Free volume to start | $50 credit, roughly your first $10,000 processed | $15 credit covering the first $3,000, down from an earlier $20,000 tier |
| Merchant KYC | None, at any volume | None documented, at any volume |
| Monero, XRP, Stellar, TON, gasless checkout | All four chains live, gasless stablecoins on eligible EVM routes and Solana | None of the four listed, no gasless option documented |
| Recurring billing and paid communities | Not offered, one-time payments and payment links only | Daily to yearly subscription links, Telegram access automation, WHMCS plugin |
Paymento cells from its published documents per the dated fact sheet, read 5 August 2026. Our cells render from the live platform.
Fresh addresses everywhere, including the account chains
Sign up with wallet material you already control and NoHoldPay derives everything else. On Bitcoin, Litecoin, Bitcoin Cash, and Dogecoin that means an xpub, the same arrangement Paymento uses. On Ethereum, TRON, and Solana it means a per-payment forwarder contract with your treasury address folded into the derivation itself, so the contract can pay out nowhere else. XRP, Stellar, and TON payments carry a per-invoice reference to your own account, and Monero runs from a private view key that lets us watch payments arrive without any ability to spend them. The chain list renders live on our homepage, because it changes.
Every address is reproducible without us. The downloadable Recovery Kit plus an offline command-line tool re-derive every forwarder you have ever been assigned, so a payment stays reachable even if NoHoldPay vanished mid-invoice. Fees come out of a prepaid credit, never out of the customer's transfer. Each confirmed payment deducts 0.5% from that credit, with no fixed fee on top.
There is one thing here Paymento has no equivalent for. On eligible EVM stablecoin routes and Solana, your customer can pay from a wallet holding no gas at all. The relay pays the network fee and the signed transfer still lands at an address bound to your treasury. Paymento documents nothing comparable, and on their model the payer funds every network fee themselves.
One shared address, and what every payer can read from it
On account-based chains, Paymento's own pages describe the model plainly: you provide your wallet address, and the customer's payment goes to it directly in a single transaction. One static address per store, shared by every customer. That is honest, it works, and it carries three costs you should weigh before choosing it.
First, privacy runs backwards. Any customer can paste your receiving address into a block explorer and read every payment your store has ever taken, amounts and timing included. Second, concurrency has a ceiling. When every invoice pays the same address, open invoices can only be told apart by their amounts, so simultaneous orders for the same price collide. Third, rotation is expensive. The address is the store's identity, which means moving to a new wallet means creating a new store.
A per-payment forwarder dissolves all three. Each invoice gets its own address, derived from your merchant identity and locked to your treasury, so no payer learns anything about any other payment, identical amounts run side by side, and a treasury rotation is a registration step with your address space intact. Both models are non-custodial. Only one of them is per-payment.
Switching from Paymento
This is the easiest migration on our comparison list, because the two models rhyme. The xpub you gave Paymento for Bitcoin-family chains is exactly what NoHoldPay asks for, and the account-chain wallets you receive to today become the treasuries our forwarders settle into. No new keys, no fund movement. WooCommerce and OpenCart stores swap one plugin for another and re-point a webhook, and API integrations replace one create-payment call plus one webhook consumer. If you run WHMCS, that piece stays with them, since we do not ship a WHMCS module. The $50 signup credit covers roughly your first $10,000 of processed volume, enough to run both gateways in parallel while you compare real payments.
One housekeeping note from their pricing page, read 5 August 2026: withdrawing an unused Paymento fee balance requires contacting their support rather than a dashboard action, so spend that balance down before you retire the store.
Where Paymento is the better fit
Recurring billing is theirs outright. Paymento sells subscription payment links on daily through yearly cycles, with reminders and grace periods, and NoHoldPay has no subscription product at all. The same goes for paid communities: their Telegram group access automation has no NoHoldPay equivalent, with Discord role automation listed as coming soon in their docs. They also ship a WHMCS plugin and route coins we do not, including DASH, Zcash, Polkadot, Avalanche, DAI, UNI, and LINK. A membership site or hosting reseller with those needs picks Paymento and still keeps a genuinely non-custodial gateway. On that axis nobody has to compromise.
Common questions
- Is Paymento really non-custodial?
- Yes. Their terms state they do not hold, manage, or control your crypto, and the mechanics match: addresses derived from your xpub on Bitcoin-family chains and your own supplied wallet on account chains, checked 5 August 2026. NoHoldPay gives the same guarantee, so this comparison turns on address architecture, coverage, and features instead of custody.
- Is Paymento cheaper than NoHoldPay?
- Both publish the same flat headline with no fixed fee, and our live rate renders at the top of this page. Paymento advertises 0.4 percent for merchants topping up with its PMO token, but that token had not launched as of August 2026. Their free tier covers the first $3,000 with a $15 credit, down from the $20,000 their docs once offered.
- Why does a per-payment address matter if both gateways are non-custodial?
- Privacy and concurrency. A shared static address lets any payer read your store's full receiving history on a block explorer, and open invoices for the same amount can only be separated by amount matching. A per-payment forwarder gives each invoice its own address, so payments stay private from each other and identical amounts never collide.
- Can I reuse my Paymento wallet setup with NoHoldPay?
- Mostly, yes. The xpub you registered for Bitcoin-family chains is exactly what NoHoldPay derives fresh addresses from, and the account-chain wallets you already receive to become the treasuries our per-payment forwarders settle into. Switching needs no new keys: add the wallets, install the WooCommerce or OpenCart plugin or swap the API calls, and re-point your webhook.
- What does Paymento offer that NoHoldPay does not?
- Recurring subscription billing on daily through yearly cycles, Telegram group access automation for paid communities with Discord roles in development, a WHMCS plugin, and routes for DASH, Zcash, Polkadot, Avalanche, DAI, UNI, and LINK. Neither gateway ships Bitcoin Lightning. If subscriptions or community access gates decide your stack, Paymento earns the pick.
Sourcing: Paymento facts on this page come from their terms of service, fees and pricing pages, developer docs, and product pages, all read 5 August 2026, including the PMO token status and current free-tier figures. NoHoldPay's rate, credit, and chain coverage render from the live platform on every load. This comparison is re-checked quarterly and whenever their pages move.
How the settlement side works in full: the non-custodial gateway page. All comparisons: the compare index.
Two non-custodial gateways, one honest test
Run one invoice through each and look up both receiving addresses on a block explorer. One shows your store's history to the payer. The other shows a single payment.
Try NoHoldPay free